2ndlook

‘Aryan’ politics behind Indus-Saraswati history

Posted in European History, History, India, Media, politics, Religion by Anuraag Sanghi on March 3, 2010

Hattusha's Lion - note the weathered mane

Hattusas' Lion - note the weathered mane

A tale of two cities

To understand the ‘politics’ of Indus-Saraswati Valley sites, a good start point is Turkey.

In 1834, local villagers  in Turkey, (then the Ottoman Empire), guided a French explorer, Charles-Felix-Marie Texier to nearby ruins.  These ruins, he  thought were ruins of the Celtic Tavium city, mentioned in various Roman sources. Instead, what he ‘found’ was a more ancient culture, that predated Rome by 1500 years.

The Hittite city of Hattusas, that Texier ‘discovered’, took another nearly 100 years to start disgorging its secrets to modern archaeologists. The name of the Hittite city, Hattusas, is itself possibly derived from the Sanskrit word, hutashan, हुताशन meaning “sacred sacrificial fire.”

Guarded by weathered stone lions, very similar to Ashoka Pillar lions, the city of Hattusas, became a cause for much politicking.

The politics of archaeology

In 1906-07, an Turkish archeologist, Theodore Makridi-Bey, started excavations at Boghazkoi, (identified as the ancient Hattusas city) 150-200 km from Ankara, Turkey. He was joined by Hugo Winckler, a German archaeologist, specialising in Assyria. They unearthed more than 10,000 clay tablets which were of tremendous interest.

Earlier, in 1904, English archaeologist John Garstang (1876-1956) lost out to Hugo Winckler, of Deutsche Orient-Gesellschaft, (German Oriental Institute) supposedly at the intervention of the German Emperor, Kaiser Wilhelm-II for excavation rights at modern Boghazkoy.

Related to Boghazkoy tablets were some of the tablets found at Tell-el-Armana, by Flinders Petrie in 1891-1892. The decipherment of the Tell-el-Amarna letters, by JA Knudtzon, in 1901, linked the few earlier tablets found at Boghazkoi-Hattusas. By French archaeologist JA Ernest Chantre in 1893-94, who was

the first in a long line of archaeologists to dig at the ancient site in the 1890s, starting with the hill top compound. His exclusive interest in tablets, unfortunately, led him to destroy everything else he uncovered.

What Makridi Bey and Winckler found, were some 10,000 clay tablets. 10,000 tablets, which no one in the world could read.

On the other side of the world

Bedřich Hrozný
Bedřich Hrozný

A Czech cryptographer, educated in Vienna, Austria, working in Germany, Bedřich (or Friedrich) Hrozný, cracked this code over the next 15 years – and that set off a furore among archaeologists. Hrozný’s

discovery was based on this short sentence written in cuneiform: NU NINDA-AN EZZATENI,WATAR-MA EKUTENI .

Since many Babylonian words were included in Hittite texts, the clue was provided by the Babylonian word ninda, which means “food” or “bread.” Hrozný asked himself a very simple question: What does one do with food or bread? The answer, of course, was, one eats it. So the word ezzateni must be related to eating.

The publication in 1922 of these tablets showed, in one case, a call to Indra, Varuna, Mitra and Nastya to witness a treaty between the Hittite king Suppiluliuma and Shattiwaza, a Mitanni. Gods that only people in India worshipped.

So, how did Vedic gods land up in Turkey, some 3500 years ago?

A deserter’s tale

Back in India, a British ‘soldier-of-fortune’ working with the English East India Company, during 1833-1838, was making his way into various parts of India. On one such trip, after,

A long march preceded our arrival at Haripah, through jangal of the closest description. East of the village was an abundance of luxuriant grass … in front of the village … (a) ruinous brick castle. Behind us was a large circular mound, or eminence, and to the west was an irregular rocky height, crowned with remains of buildings, in fragments of walls, with niches, after the eastern manner. The entire neighbourhood is embellished with numerous pipal trees, some of them in the last stage of lingering existence; bespeaking a great antiquity, when we remember their longevity. The walls and towers of the castle are remarkably high, though, from having been long deserted, they exhibit in some parts the ravages of time and decay. Between our camp and it extended a deep trench, now overgrown with grass and plants. Tradition affirms the existence here of a city, so considerable that it extended to Chicha Watni, thirteen cosses distant, and that it was destroyed by a particular visitation of Providence, brought down by the lust and crimes of the sovereign. (from “Narrative of various journeys in Balochistan, Afghanistan by Charles Masson”; underlined text in parenthesis supplied).

During his travels, over North and North West India, he “bought numerous ornaments, gems and coins in Kabul bazaar and amassed an estimated 60,000 coins, gems, seals, rings and other, mostly bronze, surface finds from the urban site of Begram north of Kabul.”

This travelogue, published in 1842, is the first known Western citing of Harappa.

Railway tracks over history

Much before 1857, the British Raj was wracked by rebellion, mutinies, uprisings, battles against colonial British rule. More than 50 of them between 1800-1850. Pushed by this state of constant war, British defense goals in India justified the expansion of Indian railway system. Many of these railway systems were set up by Indian princely states and the promoter-investors, with funds, underwritten by the Indian fare paying passengers. Buried under this railways expansion, are some vital elements of Indian history.

Between Lahore to Multan, for about a 100 km, buried under railway tracks, lies history. John Brunton, on an assignment to build railway lines from Lahore,  used bricks from Harappa “ruins, which in extent exceeded all (his) anticipations … situated on the banks of a deserted river bed.” As this section for railways was being built, contractors used precise bricks and baked clay blocks from nearby ruins and abandoned buildings, to lay the bedding, to which railways tracks were later anchored. The bricks used for this ballast were 4000-5000 year old bricks and clay material from Harappa. On this ballast, rests ‘modern’ Indian history.

Probably, even world history.

Indus Valley Civilization – a history of false starts

Alexander Cunningham, Director of Archaeological Survey of India reported in 1875, how the sites had changed from the time of his trips in 1850’s. The few seals that came to Cunningham’s attention, were promptly declared as “foreign to India.” In spite of the many finds, the first publication was of “three Indus seals discovered by the Italian scholar L. P. Tessitori at Kalibangan in 1917-18 …”

Between 1911-1912, DR Bhandarkar visited Harappa and Mohenjo daro. He thought the ruins did not represent “the remains of … any ancient monument …” and were less than 200 years old as the “bricks here found are of the modern type”.

The 1931 issue of Illustrated London News - Great New Discoveries of Ancient Indian Culture on a Virgin Prehistoric Site in Sind - further results of pioneer research at Chanu-Daro, in the Indus Valley: relics of craftsmanship, domestic life, and personal adornment in the third millennium B.C. by Ernest Mackay D. Litt, FSA, in 5 x photos of seals and seal amulets with animal designs.

The 1931 issue of Illustrated London News - Great New Discoveries of Ancient Indian Culture on a Virgin Prehistoric Site in Sind - further results of pioneer research at Chanu-Daro, in the Indus Valley: relics of craftsmanship, domestic life, and personal adornment in the third millennium B.C. by Ernest Mackay D. Litt, FSA, in 5 x photos of seals and seal amulets with animal designs.

Very little was published or studied, even though, Cunningham, Auriel Stein, DR Bhandarkar, Harold Hargreaves, were aware of Harappa and Mohenjo-daro sites.

All quiet on the Western front! Why?

Reactionary announcement

After 80 years, (1845-1924) of inaction, silence and denial, suddenly the British Raj ‘decided’ to put these ruins to some ‘good use’.

John Marshall, Director of Archaeological Survey Of India (ASI), a Lord Curzon-appointee, was despatched to Harappa and Mohenjodaro, in 1925, (his first visit!).

Despite being in India, and in ASI from 1902, Marshall’s first visit to Harappa and Mohenjodaro was in 1925. Based on his ‘insights’ and ‘intuition’ Marshall started writing an ‘authoritative’ book on the “Indus  Valley Civilization”.

What was behind this decision?

During 1800-1900, various excavations, in the Levant (Turkey, Syria, Palestine, Mesopotamia et al) Western archaeologists dug up more than 400,000 clay tablets. Showing an ‘Aryan’ linkage, pointing to India – peaking with the Boghazkoi decipherment. ‘Modern’ history does not

appreciate the colossal scale of their discoveries, decipherments, and specialized studies, and the effect of this new material in opening up the ancient Orient to European view in the period between 1880 and 1914. As scholars ransacked a vast quantity of new textual and archaeological documents, they discovered the powerful influence of Zoroastrian Persia, the esoteric depths of ancient India, and the primeval innovations of the Assyrians and Sumerians. These new cultures, appealing in their antiquity, spirituality, and apparent purity, made the well-known “orientals”—especially the ancient Israelites and Egyptians—seem derivative, corrupt, and banal …

… in the quest to give the Wilhelmine Empire autonomous and secure cultural foundations, they shared a common set of enmities—and an inclination to fight occidentalist traditions with “oriental” truths. (from German Orientalism and the Decline of the West By SUZANNE MARCHAND; ellipsis, underlined text in parenthesis supplied.).

The timing of the Indus Valley announcement, coincided with the publication of deciphered Boghaz-koi and the Amarna tablets between 1920-1925. When Indus Valley announcement was made, world historical narratives were at a delicate stage. Hegel-Marx-Muller’s historiography of ‘Aryan Invasion’ of India was hanging by a thin thread.

From the Illustrated London News - A "Sheffield of Ancient India: Chanhu-Daro's Metal Working Industry 10 x photos of copper knives, spears , razors, axes and dishes (Click for larer picture).

From the Illustrated London News - A "Sheffield of Ancient India: Chanhu-Daro's Metal Working Industry 10 x photos of copper knives, spears , razors, axes and dishes (Click for larer picture).

After WW1, with Germany defeated and Turkey dismembered, classification and announcement of the ‘Indus Valley Civilization’ (IVC) swiftly followed with a publication in Illustrated London News, in September-October 4th, 1924.  John Marshall, (Director, ASI, 1922-1927), made his first visit to Harappa-Mohenjo daro the next year, in 1925. He ‘recorded’ his excavations and investigations, in a 3-volume book.

Marshall’s tale of ‘Dravidian’ cities (Harappa /Mohenjo-daro) destroyed by ‘Aryan invaders’, has survived for nearly a 100 years. ‘Aryans’ a  Western invention, viewed through a prism of Euro-centric, colonial ideology of the 1920’s, have no basis in history or archaeology. There never was an Aryan race. On the other hands, the Aryan-Dravidian ‘divide’ were obvious colonial attempts to divert attention – and to draw attention away from the Indian connection with Boghazkoi decipherments.

And the story does not end here!

Bigger than WW2

In the dying days of the Raj, came more insidious history. At the apex of WW2, Britain pulled out a general from the Italian theatre of war and sent him to India – to head colonial India archaeological operations at ASI.

One evening in early August 1943, Brigadier General Mortimer Wheeler was resting in his tent after a long day of poring over maps, drawing up plans for invasion of Sicily. Mortimer Wheeler was invited to become the director general of archaeology by the India Office of the British government in its last years of rule in South Asia … Summoning a general from the battlefields of Europe was an extraordinary measure, an admission both of the desperate condition of Indian archaeology and an acknowledgment of its vital importance. (from The Strides of Vishnu: Hindu Culture … – Google Books; ellipsis, underlined text in parenthesis supplied).

Amazing!

Why would the glorious British Empire, on which the sun never set, struggling for its very existence, in the middle of WW2, suddenly pull a general back from the battlefield – and put him into archaeology! That too, Indian archaeology. Not Egyptian, not Greek!

One writer explains how one of Wheeler’s “main objectives was training the rising generation of Indian archaeologists in the field methods that he had perfected …” Oozing with the milk of human kindness, aren’t we? Especially, in the middle of WW II! When it was clear, that the British would be ‘departing’ from India – sooner than later.

Just why did the world’s foremost imperial power, struggling for its very existence, put a general on to the job of digging dirt.

Dirty brown Indian dirt!

Nejstarší dějiny Přední Asie a Indie Bedřich Hrozný - The oldest history of Near Asia and India

Nejstarší dějiny Přední Asie a Indie Bedřich Hrozný - The oldest history of Near Asia and India

Aryan /Indian history becomes fashionable

At the start of twentieth century, there were swarms of people wanting to study Aryan/Indian history. Along with cultural dacoits like Augustine Waddell, Auriel Stein, there were the more academic types who wrote a book on India and ‘Near East’ – Nejstarší dějinyPřední Asie a Indie by Bedřich Hrozný.

By the 1920’s under a deluge of archaeological evidence, it appeared that Indian history would run away from its rulers – the British Colonial Raj.

Usurping Aryan Achievements

While Britain and the France, for colonial reasons, were ‘discovering’ the Greek miracle, Germany and the USA started ‘discovering the ‘Aryan’ roots’ to Western civilization.

Martin Bernal, the author of ‘Black Athena” trilogy analyzes Western “amnesia” towards African contribution to Western culture. His thesis traces this ‘amnesia’ to the replacement of Europe’s “Ancient Model”  (Egypt-Greece-Rome model) of historiography with the “Aryan” (India-Mesopotamia-Babylon-Assyria) model.

Simply speaking, the West replaced Egypt as the source of culture with the Aryans. Fact is, neither the cultural achievements of Egypt (from Africa) nor of the Aryan (from India) are for the West to arrogate to themselves.

A writer on this phase of history, Susan Marchand says,

“The Aryan industry, of course, burgeoned. Even the former Kaiser Wilhelm II, in exile, took up the study of the Orient … In a 1928 letter to his friend, the former emperor reported a recent conversation with Oswald Spengler in which Wilhelm had tried his best to convince the herald of Western doom that “we are orientals [Morgenländer], and not westerners [Abendländer].” (Bold letters, italics, ellipsis mine).

With Germany and America on the Aryan train, Britain was hard pressed to control Indian historiography. ‘Fresh’ evidence was needed to show ‘Aryan’ invasion. Indus Valley civilization provided that opportunity.

The task became easier as Germany lost WW 1, and the Ottoman Empire was carved out of existence. The rump state of Turkey went down the ‘Westernization’ path. Neither Germany or Turkey were in any position to oppose Anglo-French historiography. The Egypt-Greece-Rome-Europe axis dismissed the ‘Aryan model’ archaeologists as pan Babylonists.

And after Hitler and WW II, USA no longer supported the ‘Aryan model.

The ‘Great’ Game

At the dawn of 19th century, European empires, found themselves with barren cultural cupboards. World powers in their own right, with millions of slaves from Africa, after successful’ genocides in Americas, swollen by hubris and military power, across Asia these European powers controlled capital flows across the world. For these empires, archaeology, became a ‘playing’ ground for extending intra-European ‘coopetition’ (a hackneyed business term, made up of cooperation and competition).

For Germany, the charge into archaeology, was a “national competition and a less belligerent realm for expression of resentment at Germany’s late leap into colonial activity.” And these rivalries had a telling effect.

Britons and Frenchmen almost monopolized Egyptian excavation in the 1880s and the 1890’s, but then Germans, Americans, and Italians came in. The turning point came in 1905-1907 with a rush of American expeditions and the founding of the German Archaeological Institute … In Istanbul and its Fertile Crescent provinces, German activity in the army and railroad building spilled over into archaeology. The director of Istanbul’s antiquities service and museum in the 1870s had been a German. German excavations at Pergammon in 1878 and later at Babylon and later at the Hittite capital of Boghazkoi fanned Frenchmen’s uneasiness …

World War I aborted this promising beginning. German property in Egypt was sequestered. After the war, the dispute over Borchardt’s quiet export of the bust of Nefertiti to Berlin flared up. The Eyptians refused to allow German excavation or reopening of the German Archaeological Institute till 1929, when Herman Junker replaced the embittered Borchardt … he clung to his post until 1939 despite British accusations that he worked for the Nazis. (From Whose pharaohs?: archaeology, museums, and Egyptian national identity from … By Donald Malcolm Reid, pages 196-198; ellipsis, underlined text in parenthesis supplied.).

Of course this writer does not tell the complete story of Nefertiti’s bust.

Germany alone, it is estimated, spent some four million marks, between 1899-1913 on excavations in the Middle East /West Asia.

After the founding of the Reich in 1871, archaeology became a national enterprise. The IfAK was taken over by the state, and eventually formed the basis of today’s Deutsches-Archaeologisches Institut. Rivalry with France and Britain extended to the scholarly realm, and resulted in governmental support for large-scale excavations by Ernst Robert Curtius at Olympia (1875-81), Carl Humann at Pergamon (1878-86), and eventually Robert Koldewy at Babylon (1898-1914) and Walter Andrae at Assur (1903-1914) in Ottoman Mesopotamia.[5] Wilhelm II was a particularly enthusiastic promoter of archaeology (pp. 192-199) …

Archaeology abroad grew ever more dependent on the diplomatic and financial support of the Reich for massive long-term projects … German prehistorians of the early-twentieth century also maintained that their countrymen represented the purest modern descendants of the ancient Aryans. Thus they contributed to the witches’ brew that would make up Nazi racist ideology

Out of this politics, came propaganda. In some cases, these archaeological excavations served the purpose of intelligence gathering.

The most famous example of this intelligence work was that of TE Lawrence and Leonard Woolley who were excavating at Carchemish in Syria prior to World War I. Their archaeological endeavours seem to have been secondary and perhaps even a cover for more covert activities.

While Britain and the France, for colonial reasons, were ‘discovering’ the Greek miracle, Germany and the USA started making out a case for ‘Aryan’ roots’ of Western civilization. Martin Bernal, the author of ‘Black Athena trilogy ascribes Western “amnesia” of African contribution to Europe’s replacement of the “Ancient Model” of historiography with the “Aryan” model.

Simply speaking, the West replaced Egypt as the source of culture with the Aryans.

Truth is stranger than fiction

Competition from Germany was especially very galling for the Anglo-French archaeologists and historians. Hollywood’s portrayals of the ‘German archaeologist’, even today are proof of this. Hollywood could not keep its hand off such a juicy set of characters and incidents.

To this odd and motley crowd of British, French, German and Italian archaeologists, add a character like Sheikh Hamoudi, and you have all the characters needed for a Hollywood potboiler – the Indiana Jones series.

Vendyl Jones, James Henry Breasted, Robert Braidwood, Hiram Bingham III and Roy Chapman Andrews became a mashed up Indiana Jones. Hollywood villainy drew upon German archaeologists like Hermann Junker (German archaeologist will do anything for artifacts), Otto Rahn (SS officer after Holy Grail), Ludwig Borchardt (German archaeologist ships home stolen’ artifacts).

German archaeologists  became cannon fodder to build a Hollywood caricature as a villain – as Indiana Jones’ protagonist.

Three rings for elven kings

The history of Indus-Saraswati basin sites is full of false starts – and some of these are false beginnings persist to this date.

excavating northwest India’s “forgotten cities”, historians and archaeologists had to break free from received ways of imagining the past. Cunningham, for instance, based his investigation on Hsuan Tsang’s accounts, using them to identify monasteries and stupas in the course of his surveys. Masson made his way with Alexander the Great’s 326 BC route in mind. Harappa demanded a different grid.(from On the Road to Harappa, Indian Express, Posted: Aug 14, 2005 at 0000 hrs IST).

And that different grid is something that Western historians (and their Indian and Western followers) are finding difficult to work with. The usual theory trotted out is that

The discovery of Harappa revised, in one stroke, existing theories of ancient Indian history. Until then, the earliest known Indians were believed to be the literate Hindus who lived by the Rig Veda in the Second millennium BC. Modern Hindus trace their origins to this “Vedic civilisation”, whose language and religion were considered wholly indigenous to the subcontinent. The existence of a separate pattern of settlement, an advanced civilisation predating the Vedic era by a few hundred years, raised confusing – and politically charged – questions. If the Indus Valley peoples were not Hindus, who were they? And where, then, did the Hindus come from?

This seemingly coherent scenario actually smuggles in some very potent and smooth pseudo-concepts – the concept of Hindus, Vedic and Aryans.

India did not have a religion for many centuries. Dharma ruled India.  The virus of religion was introduced by Desert Bloc – and Indian’s thereafter become ‘Hindus’. Hindus, Hinduism, in India, especially before 1000 AD is a historical fallacy. This fallacy gained significant traction, especially in the last 100 years.

MS in Sanskrit on palm-leaf, Bihar or Nepal, 11th c., 32 ff., 5x31 cm, 2 columns, (3x27 cm), 5 lines in an early Bhujimmol script, borders marked with double lines with orange pigmentation between lines, 1 miniature in text.

MS in Sanskrit on palm-leaf, Bihar or Nepal, 11th c., 32 ff., 5x31 cm, 2 columns, (3x27 cm), 5 lines in an early Bhujimmol script, borders marked with double lines with orange pigmentation between lines, 1 miniature in text.

Second is the Vedic age. There never was a Vedic age. Not in the sense that Western historiographers slot and exclude various developments. This presupposes linear, directional, phased, and centralized development of the Vedas. Assuming a command and control system, it has a non-empirical base.

For instance, this assumes that the Vedic age was dedicated to the Vedas – and all other texts developed after that.

Fact is that the Vedas depend on the trinity of Brahma, Vishnu and Mahesh; along with the Devatas and Asuras. The structure of the Devas, Asuras, Brahma, Vishnu and Mahesh can really be understood through the Upanishads,  the epics and the Puranas.  And we have not even begun on development of an ‘artificial’ language like Sanskrit  (as opposed to Prakrit).

Pauranik structures, Upanishadic debates, technical compendiums, the twin epics of Ramayana and Mahabharata were parallel developments and coeval – albeit at different stages of evolution, pace and direction.

While other cultures struggle with low or high double digits of ancient texts, India has lakhs of them. This vast body of textual creation, has not happened anywhere else in the ancient world. The very assumption that it happened in India, in a matter of a few centuries – while the Aryans, Greeks, Persians, Scythians, Tocharians, Huns, were conquering India.

During these ‘invasions’, the conquerors were kind enough to leave Indian seers, sages, munis and rishis alone so that they could carry on with the composition of these texts. Massacring the males, raping the women and enslaving the rest, in the meanwhile continued in the parallel. And after these massacres and conversions, these invaders were of course kind enough to convert  to an Indian way of life – and melt away from the centre stage of Indian history. These attempts to phase Indian culture are artificial and unproductive. Simply a caricature of history.

The third fallacy of this dating logic is the ‘Aryan’ culture. Especially, as opposed to Dravidian culture. There was no Aryan race, religion, language, armies, conquests, invasions, rulers or other such markers. The only significant markers for the Aryans were values – especially in relation to slavery. Aryan values would not allow believers to enslave or be enslaved. Slavery was an asuric construct - which Aryan values opposed and sought to end. And all regions that abolished slavery became Aryavart.

And with these three pseudo-concepts, ‘modern’ historians mangle Indian history.

Same blunt tools

After WW1, with Germany and America on the Aryan train, Britain (and by extension, the West) was hard pressed to control Indian historiography. To show ‘Aryan’ invasion, ‘fresh’ evidence was needed. Indus Valley civilization provided that opportunity.

The task became easier as Germany lost WW 1, and the Ottoman Empire was carved out of existence. The rump state of Turkey went down the ‘Westernization’ path. Neither Germany or Turkey were any position to oppose Anglo-French historiography. After Hitler and WW2, the US was also in no position to continue with the Aryan legacy story. The Egypt-Greece-Rome-Europe axis dismissed the ‘Aryan model’ archaeologists as pan Babylonists.

Before leaving India, Britain gave one, last twist, to the ‘Aryan invasion’ knife, sticking out of the Indian history side. And Mortimer Wheeler was that last twist in the Indian side by the departing British rulers.

And HARP is the proxy knife which is being used – for the same reasons, with same blunt tools, but with lesser effects.

The Hittite city of Hattusa took another nearly 100 years to disgorge its secrets -to modern archaeologists. Guarded by weathered stone lions, (very similar to Ashoka Pillars lions), the excavation became the centre of much politicking.

The politics of archaoelogy

In 1904, English archaeologist John Garstang (1876-1956) lost out to Hugo Winckler, of Deutsche Orient-Gesellschaft, (German Oriental Institute) supposedly at the intervention of the German Emperor, Kaiser Wilhelm-II for excavations at Boghaz koi.

The finds at Bogazkoy were an extension of the Tell-el-Armana archive of diplomatic correspondence found by Flinders Petrie in 1891-1892. The decipherment of the Tell-el-Amarna letter, by JA Knudtzon, in 1901, linked the few earleir tablets found at Boghazkoi-Hattusha. By French archaeologist JA Ernest Chantre in 1893-94, who was

the first in a long line of archaeologists to dig at the ancient site in the 1890s, starting with the hill top compound. His exclusive interest in tablets, unfortunately, led him to destroy everything else he uncovered.

About these ads

8 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Protagonist said, on March 14, 2010 at 5:27 pm

    Hello, came upon a novel set in 5000 B.C. titled “Return of the Aryans” published by Penguin. It’s by someone who’s well-known for writing “The Sword of Tipu Sultan”. The author’s name is Bhagwandas Gidwani. You may be interested in it. It’s quite likely that a second-hand copy could cost as much as Rs.80 as the book would have 300 large pages or more. rgds.

  2. Vedic Thinker said, on March 15, 2010 at 9:27 am

    Your Blog is a jewel. Thank you for sharing. :) Keep up the great work.

  3. Sanjana said, on May 14, 2010 at 8:12 pm

    When visiting the ever popular Museum of Natural History in US (DC), one notices an exhibit on Indus Valley Civilization – not much is stated except it is in present day Pakistan…I think for those the history belongs to, it is their obligation to preserve their history and to spread knowledge of it. Growing up in US, one will read mostly learn about Rome/Greece from young age to high school as part of curriculum -of course aside from US history. So your site is a must for Desis abroad!! India has somehow managed to maintain her history books, but what good is it if those abroad don’t know where/what to access for all the missing links to our history.

  4. Rama said, on June 29, 2010 at 7:17 am

    I came across your site via a Tamil Hindu link. Thank Godfor that.
    You are doing a fantastic work. God bless and all that.

  5. bhupinder said, on September 9, 2012 at 11:22 am

    i never got somuch insight in hindu history,i am still confused raising lot of question with evolution of language,culture and nation,,i 100% believe power are always addictive and distort history and to influence their thought ,hegemony ,it is history which is twisted and moulded to extinquish the fire for freedom,dignity an d local native culture sustainablity with cohesivenes

  6. Vyasa said, on June 29, 2013 at 9:58 pm

    There is no logic,merit,content in Euro centric views,ideas world. It was erected and was successful only through sheer brute power. There are many scholars in India who have dissed Euro centirc, Indologist views with logic,factual evidence.But popular culture,Mainstream discourse not only ignores these scholars but continues to preach its myths to its disciples whose head count is maintained through cunning and brute tactics.
    There is nothing like Pre Vedic preiod except in morphed Indologists subjects.And what we understand as religion was a miniscule part of tradition not just in India but all over the world.Concept of religion was successful wherever it went except India. Hinduism remained a moniker at grassroots level and what it is to deracinated , uprooted crowds is less important than the real reasons for their deracination.
    All these Aryan, IRC, SRC are concepts ,buzzwords for the pseudo ,dry,scholarship type Intellectuals who were brought together in the first pace to formulate a strategy to bust Bharat traditions.
    There is nothing artificial about Sanskrit.Pleasez do say why you think so..Prakrit was non scholarly language.But Sanskrit was the language of Brahmins, scholars and it was has various complex phases as you go back into history.

  7. Akhilesh said, on October 3, 2013 at 7:36 am

    अत्यंत रोचक तथा ज्ञानवर्धक सारगर्भित सटीक लेख । बस एक तथ्य स्पष्ट करना चाहूंगा – संस्कृत व्याकरण तथा सिद्धान्तपुष्ट, परिमार्जित, परिष्कृत व मानक भाषा का दिव्य प्रकाशपुञ्ज है जो नितांत आवश्यक व अपरिहार्य है; जबकि प्राकृत कोई एक भाषा नहीं अपितु कई बोलियों एवं अपरिपक्व भाषाओं का प्रवाह है।

  8. farang said, on April 9, 2014 at 11:26 am

    I must admit: I am very confused here.

    Article: “The third fallacy of this dating logic is the ‘Aryan’ culture. Especially, as opposed to Dravidian culture. There was no Aryan race, religion, language, armies, conquests, invasions, rulers or other such markers. The only significant markers for the Aryans were values – especially in relation to slavery. Aryan values would not allow believers to enslave or be enslaved. Slavery was an asuric construct – which Aryan values opposed and sought to end. And all regions that abolished slavery became Aryavart.”

    Okay, but: there was “never any Aryan religion/race/language/rulers or other such markers”…while they had values you can elucidate? That just seems unlikely. I simply cannot comprehend that statement.

    Does it never occur to people that “Aryans” were what “other peoples” called these migrating agriculturists?

    Are modern linguists incorrect to state that “Semitic” languages derive @ 40%-60% of the words from earlier Indo-Aryan? (Note it is Indo-Aryan, not “Euro-Aryan,” they acknowledge from where the language originates).

    Here is what I “see” (interpret) from recorded history and DNA results: @ 40,000 years ago, some modern type humans migrated up the east coast of Africa into the Indian sub-continent. It “appears” they stayed in this region (India, Iran, Urartu/Ararat/Syria/Assyria/Turkey/Khazahkstan/Pakistan), developed maybe the first advanced culture, then spread from those regions across the globe. I say “maybe”, because of Gobkli Tepe. (I have “found” the origin there of the “Holy Grail” myth, btw. If any are interested in reading my discovery, please write the included email address the author has here. I will send to him to post.) Of course, these remains at Gobkli Tepe could very well be of “Indian” origins too.

    I see “Narmer” as a title of an Indian “Aryan” priest/king named Naram-Simha=Vishnu. Or better said: an “emissary” of Vishnu.

    I think he was called “Manu”, and the “Scorpion King” is Narmer/Manu. Portrayed holding the distinctive mace of Indian gods, or holding the “Plow.” It may very well be ALL MYTH, and the real, “historical” military ruler/High Priest was simply “giving all glory” to his God: Vishnu/Hari (“Hori” /or in Latin “HorUs”).

    Those images of Egyptian “falcon-headed god Re/Ra?” Look closer: the falcon-headed “something” is CARRYING THE SUN on his shoulders/head inside BULL HORNS. Is the really GARUDA, the Eagle of Vishnu/The Sun, carrying the sun/Vishnu on his shoulders?

    IT IS SAME MYTHOLOGICAL IMAGERY.

    I watched a documentary with an interviewer asking an Indian official with access to ancient records if there were any references to “Aryans” and she pulled out the old records, in India, and showed it meant “Ruler/Ruling Class.” However, I also found a 1890s article, written by an Indian, that stated “Aryan” meant “to plow.” Now, some modern scholars, most actually, hold that the image of that plow meant “navigator.” No, it meant to plow. Are “mainstream” historians/archaeologists out to intentionally DECEIVE?? Sure seems that way at times.

    To me, it means “to plow.” Which one uses to “Aerate” the soil. Aryan=Aerate. And after teaching the “occupied” nations how to irrigate and plow, they were “chosen” to be “Rulers/overlords.” I see that in Hattusa, the archaeology is showing the first “settlers” (immigrants” to that region) taught the native population how to grow RICE. Which requires irrigation. “Iri”=Aryan, too.

    Funny thing: in Babylon, the “Aryan” rulers of “Karduniash” are now labeled “Kassites.” Meaning they were “Kas.” people.

    In Thailand, “Kas i korn” means Thai Farmer. They speak Pali, which came from India. I hold these people to be related to the “Kassites” of “Babylon.” “Ka” means “soul” in Egypt…and Thailand. So does “Ba.” There were rulers of Egypt in the “Intermediate periods” named “Sewad j Ka Re.” (“He makes all activities of life dependent on our status. Therefore, Vishnu is the only Hindu god responsible for discrimination. He is the only god who reincarnates.”) Re/Ra=Rama=Vishnu, yes??

    Sawasdee Ka, Re “The soul of Re is Re-incarnated/Refreshed/Rejuvenated.” (http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Who_are_brahma_vishnu_and_shiva)

    I have found images of statues from Egypt with the hieroglyphs translated (by authors, not me) as Rama. Not “Re”, not “Ra”, but RAMA.

    Ptah=Buddha. I have image of statue from Egypt, circa 1200 BC of “The Sleeping Ptah.” I have image from Leipzig museum of Amenhotep III wearing a Buddhist Wat Chedi temple crown. “Wadjet”= Wat Chedi. The “Djed/Djet” columns are not the “spine of Osiris”: they are Wat Chedi temples! That is why “Djet” also means “Ancestors” in ancient Egyptian!

    BTW: Akhenaton’s “Kiya” was a Sanskrit word for the “goddess of reeds.” .

    And where did Moses retrieve the “tablets” from god? Mt. Nebo.

    In some of the Armana letters, foreign kings call Akhenaton “Nebu kudurri ya(User). Nebuchadrezer (see Wikipedia). Why is that significant? Because Nebu/Nebo is the “God of the Tablets (Laws).”

    I think we can put to rest who the “biblical/historical “Moses.” was. Ish (One) Naton (God). He was re-playing a role that dated back over a thousand years ealier than his time. Sargon of Akkad was another “Moses” archetype. “Akki the Water Drawer” is Aquarius, the Water Bearer.” And his name wasn’t “Sargon” either: Sar=King. “Gon” = Khan/ This person was called “King King”: Shar-kalli-shari. Does that mean “King of kings: Kaldi? Vishnu?? Is “Kaldi” the god of Chaldeans? Is Chaldea Urartu?? “Northern Babylon/southern Urartu??”

    Here is another: A very recent article from Egypt states they have found a mummy of an Egyptian woman (circa 700 BC) with a tattoo of “Archangel Michael.” That intrigued me, because I think: “Michael” is Shiva. Joshua: Destroyer of Cities=Shiva the Destroyer.

    In Tut’s tomb, some allege was found the “Robe of the Me’il.” The robe of the high priests called “Cohen Gadols.”

    Ahmed Osman makes a very solid case for Tut being the origin of the “Joshua” Judaic myth (Joshua IS “Jesus”, translated from Greek to English). I think strongly that “Joshua” is Shiva. The O.T./Talmud also calls him :Hosea”, a form of Juoshua.” (Shiva is called “Shua” in Egyptian mythology, used to be a VERY important god/buddy of Ra(ma), then faded in importance. According to Wikipedia (Shiva), both are pronounced “Shu.”)

    And “Mahakala” /”Michael”is Shiva (Wikipedia, “Mahakala.”). “Joshua and Moses”. according to the “O.T./Talmud, knew each other well, eh?

    Wikipedia (Ganesha) states that Ganesha is Mahakala is Shiva, and the earliest image found is from Loristan, Iran. (1200 BC, when some Indian scholars state the “Mahabharata War” was fought.) Loristan: the (“mythical?) “homeland” of the Aryans. Is this the real “Invasion of the Sea peoples”: the Mahabharata war? I think without a doubt.

    Ramses II was “Priam.” No doubt: he was Let me quickly prove it to you, dear reader:

    “The Manapa-Tarhunda letter is about a member of the Hittite ruling family, Piyama-Radu, who gained control of the kingdom of Wilusa, and whose only serious opposition came from the author of this letter, Manapa-Tarhunda. King Muwatalli of the Hittites was the opponent of this king of Troy, and the result of Muwatalli’s campaign is not recorded in the surviving texts.[11]:245–247 The Ahhiyawa, generally identified with the Achaean Greeks,[11]:59–63 are mentioned in the Tawagalawa letter as the neighbors of the kingdom of Wilusa, and who provided a refuge for the troublesome renegade Piyama-Radu.[11″

    Who is the father of “Piyama-Radu?

    “Piyamaradu’s renegade activities are remarkable for their duration, having spanned at least 35 years,[3] during which time he posed a considerable threat to three Hittite kings: Muwatalli II, Hattusili III, and Tudhaliya IV.”

    How long??? 35 years??? This can ONLY be Ramses II, the “biblical” Solomon.”

    “Popular conjecture proposes that Piyamaradu was the legitimate heir of Uhha-Ziti, a previous king of Arzawa who was dethroned by the Hittite king Mursili II, and probably the son of his son Piyama-Kurunta,[4] although this is entirely speculative, and he is nowhere referred to as a prince. Bryce and Sommers prefer to describe him as a “rebellious Hittite dignitary”.[5] His attacks and raiding activities on the Hittite vassal states in Western Anatolia of Arzawa, Seha, Lazpa (Lesbos) and Wilusa (Troy) have been interpreted by some scholars as an attempt to reassert his own dynastic claim.”

    Uhha-“Zitti.” Who was Ramses II’s father? SETI I.

    (Wikipedia “Ramses II) READ CAREFULLY: “After the enormous social upheavals generated by Akhenaten’s religious reform, Horemheb, Ramesses I and Seti I’s main priority was to re-establish order in the kingdom and to reaffirm Egypt’s sovereignty over Canaan and Syria, which had been compromised by the increasing external pressures from the Hittite state. Seti, with energy and determination, confronted the Hittites several times in battle. Without succeeding in destroying the Hittites as a potential danger to Egypt, he reconquered most of the disputed territories for Egypt and generally concluded his military campaigns with victories.”

    There, that was kind of easy, no???? Can anyone debate that Ramses II was Priam (named after his city Per-Ramses?) was “Piyama-Radu”, or that Ramses II worshiped Yam? Brother (twin??) of Ba’al?

    And:

    The Narmer Pallette: Andis Kaulins of lexiline.com, states those odd-looking long-necked “beasts” on the pallette are long-necked lions.
    Naram-Simha? Has two prominent Bulls on top of pallette: Vishnu’s bulls?

    “Yuya.” His son-in-law, Amenhotep III, was aka the “great debaucherer.” Married to 300 women, with concubines. I hold that this was a mythical role he was playing, and that his father-in-law Yuya is Yayati, the great Debaucher King of the Purus in the Mahabharata. And that his brother “Ayati” was the father of Chetiti (it is not pronounced Nefer, it is “Che”) The Hittite Queen.

    Lastly, I hold that “Brahma” worship didn’t fade away: it morphed into Judaism, with “Abram/Brahma” being the “Father” of the Jews.” The Hittites worshiped Kaldi/Vishnu. The Hebrews worshiped Brahma and Shiva. The Trimurda. (http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Who_are_brahma_vishnu_and_shiva): “Being god of creativity and having the ability to make activities independent of rest of our life, Brahma can make our life Demonic. It is for this fact that Brahma is not worshiped.” Did Brahma morph to “Set” in Judaism?

    Done. Sorry if this offends anyone, I just report what I read. I do not find any of these assertions to be “far-fetched”, do you? Seems like ALL ASTROLOGICAL MYTH, to me.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,042 other followers

%d bloggers like this: